International Science Index


Optimization of Solar Tracking Systems


In this paper, an intelligent approach is proposed to optimize the orientation of continuous solar tracking systems on cloudy days. Considering the weather case, the direct sunlight is more important than the diffuse radiation in case of clear sky. Thus, the panel is always pointed towards the sun. In case of an overcast sky, the solar beam is close to zero, and the panel is placed horizontally to receive the maximum of diffuse radiation. Under partly covered conditions, the panel must be pointed towards the source that emits the maximum of solar energy and it may be anywhere in the sky dome. Thus, the idea of our approach is to analyze the images, captured by ground-based sky camera system, in order to detect the zone in the sky dome which is considered as the optimal source of energy under cloudy conditions. The proposed approach is implemented using experimental setup developed at PROMES-CNRS laboratory in Perpignan city (France). Under overcast conditions, the results were very satisfactory, and the intelligent approach has provided efficiency gains of up to 9% relative to conventional continuous sun tracking systems.

[1] M. Despotovic, and V. Nedic, “Comparison of optimum tilt angles of solar collector determined at yearly, seasonal and monthly levels”, Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 97, pp.121–131, 2015.
[2] H. Mousazadeh, A. Keyhani, A. Javadi, H. Mobli, K. Abrinia, and A. Sharifi “A review of principle and sun-tracking methods for maximizing solar systems output”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 13, pp. 1800–1818, 2009.
[3] R. C. Neville,” Solar energy collector orientation and tracking mode”, Solar Energy, vol. 20, pp. 7–11, 1978.
[4] N. A. Kelly, and T. L. Gibson, “Improved photovoltaic energy output for cloudy conditions with a solar tracking system”, Solar Energy, vol. 83, pp. 2092–2102, 2009.
[5] N. A. Kelly, and T. L. Gibson, “Increasing the solar photovoltaic energy capture on sunny and cloudy days”, Solar Energy, vol. 85, pp. 111–125, 2011.
[6] R. Marquez, H. T. C. Pedro, and C. F. M. Coimbra, “Hybrid solar forecasting method uses satellite imaging and ground telemetry as inputs to ANNs”. Solar Energy, vol. 92, pp. 176–188, 2013.
[7] R. Marquez, and C. F. M. Coimbra, “Intra-Hour DNI forecasting based on cloud tracking image analysis”. Solar Energy, vol. 91, pp. 327–336.
[8] C. N. Long, J. M. Sabburg, J. Calbo, and D. Pagés, “Retrieving cloud characteristics from ground-based daytime color all-sky images”, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., vol. 23, pp. 633–652, 2006.
[9] A. Heinle, A. Macke, and A. Srivastav, “Automatic cloud classification of whole sky images”, Atmos. Meas. Tech., vol. 3, pp. 557–567, doi:10.5194/amt-3-557-2010, 2010.
[10] Q. Li, W. Lu, and J. Yang, “A hybrid thresholding algorithm for cloud detection on ground-based color images”, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., vol. 28, pp. 1286–1296, 2011.
[11] E. H. Mamdani, and S. Assilian, “An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller”, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, vol. 7, pp. 1-13,1975.
[12] T. Takagi, and M. Sugeno, “Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control”, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, vol. 15, pp. 116-32, 1985.
[13] L. Suganthi, S. Iniyan, and A. A. Samuel, “Applications of fuzzy logic in renewable energy systems–a review”. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 48, pp. 585-607, 2015.
[14] A. Ghanem and A. Zaher, “Fuzzy rule-based model for optimal management of marine protected areas: a case study on the marine reserve Cerbère-Banyuls”, International Journal of Research- GRANTHAALAYAH, vol. 5, pp. 239-251. 2017.