International Science Index


10008705

Comparative Study of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks for Smart City

Abstract:

In this paper, we perform the investigation of some routing protocols in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network (VANET) context. Indeed, we study the efficiency of protocols like Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), Ad hoc On-demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV), Destination Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV), Optimized Link State Routing convention (OLSR) and Vehicular Multi-hop algorithm for Stable Clustering (VMASC) in terms of packet delivery ratio (PDR) and throughput. The performance evaluation and comparison between the studied protocols shows that the VMASC is the best protocols regarding fast data transmission and link stability in VANETs. The validation of all results is done by the NS3 simulator.

References:
[1] Stadler, Christina, Flamm, Xenia, Gruber, Thomas, et al. Communication Characteristics of VANETs. 5th GI/ITG KuVSFachgespräch Inter-Vehicle Communication, 2017, p. 33.
[2] Milne, James R., Carlsson, Gregory Peter, et Zustak, Frederick J. Vehicle ad hoc network (vanet). U.S. Patent Application No 15/149,562, 9 mai 2016.
[3] Menouar, Hamid, Guvenc, Ismail, Akkaya, Kemal, et al. UAV-Enabled Intelligent Transportation Systems for the Smart City: Applications and Challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2017, vol. 55, no 3, p. 22-28.
[4] Alexander, W., Hong, X., et Hainen, A. V2I Communication-Enabled Real-Time Intersection Traffic Signal Scheduling. In: Proceedings of the SouthEast Conference. ACM, 2017. p. 26-33.
[5] Solano, Sandra Escamilla, Casado, Paola Plaza, et Ureba, Sandra Flores. Smart Cities and Sustainable Development. A Case Study. In: Sustainable Smart Cities. Springer International Publishing, 2017. p. 65-77.
[6] Khatoun, Rida et Zeadally, Sherali. Smart cities: concepts, architectures, research opportunities. Communications of the ACM, 2016, vol. 59, no 8, p. 46-57.
[7] A. Afanasyev, I. Moiseenko, and L. Zhang, Developing NS-3 based NDN simulator, CCNx Community Meeting held at PARC, September 2011. (Online). Available: http://www.ccnx.org/ccnxcon2011program.
[8] Liu, Weiwei, Wang, Xichen, Zhang, Wenli, et al. Coordinative simulation with SUMO and NS3 for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. In: Communications (APCC), 2016 22nd Asia-Pacific Confewwrence on. IEEE, 2016. p. 337-341.
[9] Laouiti, Anis, Qayyum, Amir, et Saad, Mohamad Naufal Mohamad. Vehicular Ad-HOC Networks for Smart Cities. Springer Verlag, Singapor, 2016.
[10] Purohit, Kamlesh Chandra, Dimri, Sushil Chandra, et Jasola, Sanjay. Performance evaluation of various MANET routing protocols for adaptability in VANET environment. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2016, p. 1-13.
[11] Dong, Baihong, Deng, Jian, Wu, Weigang, et al. Topology Analysis System for Vehicular Ad Hoc Network. In: Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies (PDCAT), 2016 17th International Conference on. IEEE, 2016. p. 299-302.
[12] Yang, Liu, Xiang, Weidong, et Zheng, Guoxin. A Study on Vehicle Connectivity for VANETs Adopting Beamforming Antenna Array. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017, vol. 2017.
[13] Dixit, Mayank, Kumar, Rajesh, et Sagar, Anil Kumar. VANET: Architectures, research issues, routing protocols, and its applications. In: Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA), 2016 International Conference on. IEEE, 2016. p. 555-561.
[14] Pandagre, Karuna Nidhi, Joshi, Apoorva, et Jharia, Jayanti. Vehicular Ad-HOC Network: VANET. International Journal of Research in Computer Application and Robotics, 2016, vol. 4, no 2, p. 29-32.
[15] Al-Sultan, Saif, AL-DOORI, Moath M., AL-BAYATTI, Ali H., et al. A comprehensive survey on vehicular ad hoc network. Journal of network and computer applications, 2014, vol. 37, p. 380-392.
[16] Rashvand, Habib F. et Chao, Han-Cheh. Dynamic ad hoc networks. Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2013.
[17] Marzak, Bouchra, Toumi, Hicham, Benlahmar, Elhabib, et al. Performance analysis of routing protocols in vehicular ad hoc network. In: Advances in Ubiquitous Networking 2. Springer Singapore, 2017. p. 31-42.
[18] Maratha, Barakat Pravin, Sheltami, Tarek R., et Shakshuki, Elhadi M. Performance Evaluation of Topology based Routing Protocols in a VANET Highway Scenario. International Journal of Distributed Systems and Technologies (IJDST), 2017, vol. 8, no 1, p. 34-45.
[19] Kumar, Vimlesh et BAGHEL, Anurag Singh. Comparison between AODV protocol and LSGR protocol in VANET. In: Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), 2016 3rd International Conference on. IEEE, 2016. p. 3026-3030.
[20] Varshney, Pankaj Kumar, Agrawal, G. S., et Sharma, Sudhir Kumar. Relative Performance Analysis of Proactive Routing Protocols in Wireless Ad hoc Networks using Varying Node Density. Invertis Journal of Science & Technology, 2016, vol. 9, no 3, p. 161-169.
[21] Singh, Lalit et SAROIA, Ashish. Performance Comparison of Two MANET Routing Protocols (AODV and DSDV). Journal of Network Communications and Emerging Technologies (JNCET) www. jncet. org, 2017, vol. 7, no 5.
[22] Gupta, Kanika et Kohli, Asst Prof Saurabh. Optimizing OLSR Protocol for VANET. Asian Journal of Technology and Management Research (AJTMR) Volume, 2016, vol. 6, no 02.
[23] Ucar, Seyhan, Ergen, SinemColeri, et Ozkasap, Oznur. VMaSC: Vehicular multi-hop algorithm for stable clustering in vehicular ad hoc networks. In: Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2013 IEEE. IEEE, 2013. p. 2381-2386.
[24] http://www.manutencionyalmacenaje.com/es/img2/2013/12/671_its_mlt_euskadi-7563.jpg.